Jump to content


Unusual Matchmaker Submissions

balance

  • Please log in to reply
319 replies to this topic

Rohit_suryawanshi #301 Posted 05 May 2017 - 03:21 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 11332 battles
  • 6
  • [-IN-]
  • Member since:
    01-22-2016
Please stop matchmaking a tier 8 tank against tier 10 tanks. It makes no sense in such battles especially when its like t8 RHM against a t10 FV183.

Joy_127 #302 Posted 05 May 2017 - 03:25 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Member
  • 46141 battles
  • 437
  • [-IQ-]
  • Member since:
    08-04-2015

View PostRohit_suryawanshi, on 05 May 2017 - 08:51 AM, said:

Please stop matchmaking a tier 8 tank against tier 10 tanks. It makes no sense in such battles especially when its like t8 RHM against a t10 FV183.

 

It's not possible to get matched against a t10 tank in ur t8 tank unless u f up and make a fail plstoon

Rohit_suryawanshi #303 Posted 09 May 2017 - 05:04 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 11332 battles
  • 6
  • [-IN-]
  • Member since:
    01-22-2016

View PostJoy_127, on 05 May 2017 - 03:25 AM, said:

 

It's not possible to get matched against a t10 tank in ur t8 tank unless u f up and make a fail plstoon

If a +1/-1 platoon is called a f up then why does wotb gives an option to do so, they should stop giving such as an option. Let platoon have same tier before battle button goes live. 



Kabama04 #304 Posted 09 May 2017 - 10:21 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 10214 battles
  • 193
  • [LTEVL]
  • Member since:
    07-30-2016

Just remember the old MatchMaking Algorithm

It was +2/-2


 

 "If God is for us, who can be against us?" Wargaming. Wargaming is against us.

-Space_Ape_Marksman


Rustie_boy4 #305 Posted 10 May 2017 - 04:57 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 4230 battles
  • 3
  • [-CREW]
  • Member since:
    07-02-2015

 

I had a game with 4 Hetzers, matilda, Pz B2 and Pz. IIIA on one team and then 

a hetzer, m3 lee, matilda, 2 T-28, SU 85B and Valentine AT.

 

I cant upload the photo though. 

 

 

 

 


Edited by Rustie_boy4, 10 May 2017 - 05:10 AM.


Kabama04 #306 Posted 10 May 2017 - 09:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 10214 battles
  • 193
  • [LTEVL]
  • Member since:
    07-30-2016

When you have logic, you don't have RNGesus

(look at their Leopards)

Attached Files

  • Attached File   IMG_6964.PNG   692.33K

Edited by Kabama04, 11 May 2017 - 10:46 PM.

 

 "If God is for us, who can be against us?" Wargaming. Wargaming is against us.

-Space_Ape_Marksman


xXYolo_Noob_DriverXx #307 Posted 25 May 2017 - 04:17 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 12051 battles
  • 1,869
  • [WOTSG]
  • Member since:
    12-12-2013
Make sure 2 spotters in each team. Too many one sided battle 

Sign this petition against AFKs, Bots, and Trolls

https://www.change.o...olators-in-wotb

Lore's: IS-3D, Rudy, Angry Connor, E25, Fearless, Dragon, JgTg Snowstorm


Kabama04 #308 Posted 01 June 2017 - 10:13 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 10214 battles
  • 193
  • [LTEVL]
  • Member since:
    07-30-2016

Is the Matchmaker broken? I played 20 games in my KV-2, all tier 7s

 


 

 "If God is for us, who can be against us?" Wargaming. Wargaming is against us.

-Space_Ape_Marksman


nikhilsingh1892 #309 Posted 08 June 2017 - 05:37 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 30223 battles
  • 34
  • Member since:
    02-09-2015
WGs matchmaker works absolutely perfect by somehow alloting me the loser team everytime.  It has to b because a losing streak of 8-15 battles consecutively mustn't happen on a genuinely random matchmaker

adreeen #310 Posted 30 June 2017 - 03:53 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 6286 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    07-13-2016

This is not a post about unusual situations. It is a post about a usual situation.

 

I lose 60% of my games. 90% of them are 0-7 and 0-6 cleansweeps for the OPFOR.

 

90% of the time, I am in the team with:

- fewer clan members

- lower tier platoons

- more Player_3575156165735575s

- more TDs (as in half the team)

 

There is nothing unusual about this. It is the norm for me.

And what I get from this is "noob", "uninstall"?

I'm not the one(s) registering 0 dmg. I'm not the one hiding when the team runs into an ambush. I'm not the one rushing off alone to do my business.

But here I am, taking 0-7 defeat after 0-7 defeat, and being told repeatedly that this is what I deserve from a "random" MM.

 

I'll post a screenshot when I get something out of the ordinary, like having a decent team.

 

It's the most chilling feeling, realizing that this game is being run by people who seem distinctly more Soviet than Russian (well I guess they're the same).

And there I was thinking only governments could be this corrupt, this shameless, this 1984-esque.

 

EDIT:

12 hours after this post, I logged on to experience 5 straight wins. It is a new personal record.

Another 12 hours later, 8 defeats in 9, in Tiers IV and IX. I had teammates who SOLOed to death, who rushed to an opposite corner of the map with a friend, who intentionally blocked each other from moving for 4 minutes.

These players aren't the problem. There's always some crazy people around. The problem is when you always end up among the crazy people, and those in power keep trying to convince you that it's normal, keep currying your favor by giving you little enticements like several easier games than "normal".

It's all very Donald Trump. Token appeasement, and then twice as bad a situation as the original one.

 

 


Edited by adreeen, 01 July 2017 - 04:22 PM.


oidet #311 Posted 03 July 2017 - 06:44 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 24213 battles
  • 22
  • [OUTZ]
  • Member since:
    05-14-2015

Absolutely agree with ur post Adreen. This matchmaking is really corrupted. There is no way to get a decent game. Mine is also lots of 7-0 defeats, with only one or two team members have brain. The rest just rush ahead to death or follow other players blindly without knowing their role in the battle. Worse, these noobs think they are so goods that they ignore other advice and just run around. I often end up being the last one to hold off vs 5-6 enemies. Platooning does not help as immediately when i platoon with my friend, we are matched to complete noobs team vs a very strong enemy team.

Honestly, WG want us to all quit this game out of frustration? No matter medals u give, loss is still a loss, and nobody want to lose games after games in this manner. 

What differentiate this game from others is because there are a strong community of committed good players. What do WG think if these players gradually quit?

 



oidet #312 Posted 03 July 2017 - 05:12 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 24213 battles
  • 22
  • [OUTZ]
  • Member since:
    05-14-2015
Oh and to further add to my above post. Tonight i have a string of loss all in my tier 10 tds. I mean cant even get a win game no matter how hard i tried. In all the game im last survival, and overwhelmed by all enemy tanks fron all sides, since my all teammates (those who do not deserve to be called so) all go seek death stupidly. And when i text a noob guy on what was in his mind explaining his action, he replied "this is a game, i played for fun, nothing serious, my phone my game, what can u do?". He is absolutely right, i cant do anything at all to win when all matched to 6 players like that. [edited] this game has turned into?. 

adreeen #313 Posted 04 July 2017 - 03:31 PM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 6286 battles
  • 39
  • Member since:
    07-13-2016

View Postoidet, on 03 July 2017 - 06:44 AM, said:

Honestly, WG want us to all quit this game out of frustration? No matter medals u give, loss is still a loss, and nobody want to lose games after games in this manner. 

What differentiate this game from others is because there are a strong community of committed good players. What do WG think if these players gradually quit?

 

You have to think from their perspective. They are not an establishment that lives on principles. If their style is profit maximization with no other regard, then what they are doing is textbook behaviour.

 

Yes, of course they need a community of committed players, but what does that give them? Just people using their game? No, that's not good enough. They need a community of committed players who are committed to generating cash for them. Yes, ads play a part in this, but by and large they get far more cash directly out of players' pockets. So there's a condition here; you can't just be a committed player, you have to be a committed player while also being a cash cow. If you're not, then sorry, you don't have VIP status. You're just as replaceable as the hordes of "whatever" players who show up for a game or two from time to time, just to get beat by the VIPs who get another boost to their WR, another pat on the back, and further confirmation that they are indeed a class above the commoners.

 

Bottom line: WG are doing this for money. Nothing else. Do not expect them to go by business ethics or corporate responsibility. Do not expect them to treat this game as the be all and end all for them. The absolute worst case scenario? The game tanks, so what? They'll just have to start another one and sell it the exact same way. I think they have made that very clear themselves. It's not like they're trying to disguise their behaviour as something else.



__Beer_18__ #314 Posted 16 July 2017 - 01:45 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 4608 battles
  • 1
  • [MAGIC]
  • Member since:
    07-12-2016

ถูกล็อคสำหรับบัญชีนี้ จะต้องทำไง



Kabama04 #315 Posted 16 July 2017 - 06:23 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 10214 battles
  • 193
  • [LTEVL]
  • Member since:
    07-30-2016

View Post__Beer_18__, on 16 July 2017 - 11:45 AM, said:

ถูกล็อคสำหรับบัญชีนี้ จะต้องทำไง

 

 

This is the English Forums by the way.


 

 "If God is for us, who can be against us?" Wargaming. Wargaming is against us.

-Space_Ape_Marksman


Kabama04 #316 Posted 23 July 2017 - 04:49 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 10214 battles
  • 193
  • [LTEVL]
  • Member since:
    07-30-2016
I’d like to see some balance in the matchmaker, we had a game against 2 T49 and they destroyed all of us, can the matchmaker maybe only put 1 of each certain tanks on each team?

 

 "If God is for us, who can be against us?" Wargaming. Wargaming is against us.

-Space_Ape_Marksman


FeralCat #317 Posted 23 July 2017 - 07:49 AM

    Corporal

  • Member
  • 14257 battles
  • 16
  • [BOGAN]
  • Member since:
    04-30-2016

This is not so much an unusual matchmaker but what I think is unfair.

It is commonplace for me to play over 9 or 10 matches in a row with me being one of, or the only lower tier tank every match, I then will get a few matches being one of the higher tiers but then I play many more being on the bottom again.

Surely there are enough players of this game to cycle the tiers more fairly or even match the same tiers more often.

It becomes disheartening fighting against tanks you cant even pen.



kunanyi #318 Posted 27 July 2017 - 11:55 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 11613 battles
  • 4
  • [COMA]
  • Member since:
    04-06-2016

Hi This isn't about matching but does in a way. I've been waiting over 25 minutes so far to play in a rating battle, I understand it has to do with time and numbers but I find this over the top time to wait. It isn't worth the wait and if you exit from battle your vehicle is dormant and potentially will receive bad feedback from all players. What do others think?

regards kunanyi

 



ShuLL22 #319 Posted 05 August 2017 - 04:51 PM

    Private

  • Member
  • 617 battles
  • 1
  • [IDFOW]
  • Member since:
    10-20-2015

And my first post in this forum..

 

7 LTs vs 3 MTs, 1 TD and 3 LTs..

 

Needless to say, we get steamrolled over.. kinda annoying ain't it?

Attached Files

  • Attached File   WhatsApp Image 2017-08-05 at 23.49.43.jpeg   127.57K


Esh11 #320 Posted 12 September 2017 - 02:06 PM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 27993 battles
  • 709
  • [HCL]
  • Member since:
    03-20-2015
All noobs on my team and pros on red team 





Also tagged with balance

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users