48 replies to this topic

[fonblets]

not so often i see ppl afk when i go battle. roughly it happen in once in 10/15 matches.

[Meanist____]

I could never understand the point of going afk. But once my game crashed at the start before I got to even move by the time I got back online I had been destroyed but still received around 9000 credits, and then you can have another game in the same tank give it all you got and end up losing that much or more.

[Dr_Jedi]

Meanist____, on 24 August 2015 - 12:38 PM, said:

I could never understand the point of going afk. But once my game crashed at the start before I got to even move by the time I got back online I had been destroyed but still received around 9000 credits, and then you can have another game in the same tank give it all you got and end up losing that much or more.

 

Yes exactly..

 

If AFKs didn't earn anything, nobody will do it deliberately.

[CatOnFirez]

Poklasman, on 21 August 2015 - 04:32 PM, said:

Now I can see myself a possible victim of double whammy.  I have been AFK'ing almost 3 of every 10 battles lately.  Not my intention, but suddenly see my tank stopping although turret can be turned, everyone else stops moving. Everytime I experience this I leave and restart the game.  Lucky if I get back to the game with my tank still alive but in many cases I just got back in the game with a dead tank.  

 

If I will be reported for going AFK and be penalised, then WG would be doing a gross injustice.  My ping is stable but my tank wouldn't simply move.  Unlike a high ping where my tank either sinks to the ground or flies in the air.  While I hate tanks on my team going AFK, you will hate it more if you find your tank going AFK against your will.

 

The GM team will do the investigation manually before any ban, but it would be nice if you try to get a better device to play the WOTB.

 

The GM team did their jobs and follow the ANTI AFK POLICY

You may refer the link above and we will follow this policy as for now until an ingame anti afk system implemented in future.

 

By the mean time, please keep report the AFK to the Support or send to me via Forum PM. 

 

Regards,

L.S

[Dr_Jedi]

LiquidSnake, on 24 August 2015 - 01:05 PM, said:

we will follow this policy as for now until an ingame anti afk system implemented in future.

Thanks LiquidSnake.

 

There is light at the end of tunnel.

[RazorOmegaOne]

Pimp_Daddy_XR, on 21 August 2015 - 01:17 PM, said:

 

I don't blame them - I'm scared of OP's new Banhammer..!

 

Maybe the trolls did add a spark to things, but I think the forum is friendlier since the ban on bile.

 

Played against the player called "Banhammer" just now.Immediately went into best behaviour(Let a slow KV-4 pass before I started moving)

[OP_Assassin]

RazorOmegaOne, on 24 August 2015 - 11:17 PM, said:

Played against the player called "Banhammer" just now.Immediately went into best behaviour(Let a slow KV-4 pass before I started moving)

 

I think I met you lol. I don't really remember all I have been doing is spamming is6 hahaha

[Fosknow]

LiquidSnake, on 24 August 2015 - 02:35 PM, said:

 

The GM team will do the investigation manually before any ban, but it would be nice if you try to get a better device to play the WOTB.

 

The GM team did their jobs and follow the ANTI AFK POLICY

You may refer the link above and we will follow this policy as for now until an ingame anti afk system implemented in future.

 

By the mean time, please keep report the AFK to the Support or send to me via Forum PM. 

 

Regards,

L.S

These are typical responses I get when I report AFZ players. See pics. Now, you need three pics?

Edited by Fosknow, 28 August 2015 - 10:13 AM.

[Gandalf__Greyhame]

afk's everywhere