I've been playing this game for a few weeks now and my win rate has settled around 50%, which is what I'd expect, given that everyone who plays is roughly similar in outlook and aptitude. (This is not an invitation to rail against "nubs" spoling the game. If you want to do that, go find a padded cell somewhere.) Sometimes you end up on a team that just clicks and slaughters the opposition, at other times you're on the team being slaughtered. So 50% feels about right. Some variation upwards when things are going well, and downwards when they're not. (They haven't been today, which is probably why I've been moved to write this.)
However, I get the feeling that players are judged on their win rate. But hang on: in only some battles does the player's indivividual contribution - or the lack of it - make a blind bit of difference. Over the last couple of days I have been one-shotted out of the game three times. Just spotted the enemy, getting into position and bang! Gone.(Tank destroyers. I hate playing them or being played by them.) Two of those battles my team went on to win. I contributed 0 to the victory, but it's part of my 50% win rate. Conversely, a few times I've fought hard, racked up an impressive damage score, but my team has lost, so despite my best efforts, my win rate goes down. Does the win rate really mean anything at all, given how much chance is built into the game? And given we know the RNG can decide that a series of direct hits in one battle "bounced off" while in another they knock out the target? Much better to judge players on how much damage they have been able to do.
Please feel to argue the toss. I'd like to think I'm not the only person alive on this forum. : )
Edited by AncientRuffian, 03 February 2023 - 04:03 AM.