Jump to content


Should thear be a 4 barrel td?

Non anima. Tank destroyers

  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

Poll: Should ther be a quad barrel td (17 members have cast votes)

Should there be a quadruple barrel td

  1. Yes (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. No (3 votes [16.67%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 16.67%

  3. [edited] yes (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Finally something to stand up against the deth star (5 votes [27.78%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 27.78%

  5. O hell no (10 votes [55.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 55.56%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Dudsirratateing #1 Posted 07 January 2018 - 03:45 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 6185 battles
  • 3
  • [ONLY-]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
Quadruple barrel tank destroyer with the old Death Star gun sound the gun wold fire a shell at a time and it is 1 press for 4 shels the barrel wold also revolve it wold be a auto loder with 8 in a clip 8 seconds for shells to reload 15 for the entire clip the front wold be impenetrable including the traks the sides wold be angled and spaced but penetration is possible on traks and amor the back is spaced and hevely angled but has paper like armor forward spead is 100kph left right terning spead is 90 stationery terning spead is the 5th sloest in game reverse is 40kph the colour of tank is black with glowing perpul cracks all over with perpul fire coming out of the cracks this shells are armor piecing dealing 300 damage a shell smoke round for a getaway flash rounds for 5 second blinding effect and high explosive with 500 damage per shell ther ap will be able to go through the front other tanks of same type he wil have 120 pen smoke and flash will do 0 damage and have 0 pen health is 3000 the gun can go vertical both ways  and is extremely long tir is 10 and will always make a good profit of 20k minimum but is extremely expensive to run so much so it will take 50 games to have same amount of silver you had befor you gave the tank a full load out 

Dudsirratateing #2 Posted 07 January 2018 - 03:46 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 6185 battles
  • 3
  • [ONLY-]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2015
It’s pereimum tank btw it’s a Aussie like me and only AUSSIE AUSSIE AUSSIE OI OI OI

LoneReaper #3 Posted 07 January 2018 - 08:59 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Member
  • 27690 battles
  • 363
  • [MECH]
  • Member since:
    04-03-2015
:facepalm:

erwin10001 #4 Posted 07 January 2018 - 09:09 AM

    First Lieutenant

  • Member
  • 42026 battles
  • 993
  • [NETS]
  • Member since:
    11-12-2016

why only 4 barrels? why not 6? WG's competitor already has it.

 

M50 Ontos.

 

WG can also introduce a new Epic Medal for 6 kills with one shot. 


Edited by erwin10001, 07 January 2018 - 09:10 AM.


f1reguy #5 Posted 07 January 2018 - 11:31 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Member
  • 38348 battles
  • 250
  • [1914]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

Rather see arty than this idea...just sounds big and slow. 

On that note why couldn’t we just get the t49a back lol...or maybe even go all call of duty and call in air strikes like the commander can in WOT, although I think it’s artilliary there.



XF1_Razer #6 Posted 08 January 2018 - 09:17 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 13305 battles
  • 216
  • [DARTH]
  • Member since:
    03-17-2017

My gosh. How old are you? 6?

Australia’s military power lies in its Navy which isn’t even good. Don’t be such a child because WG isn’t going to add a quadruple barreled tank. Not only would it be stupid, but rife with scientific inaccuracy. Such a high amount of recoil would obviously result in turret damage. 100kmph? Rubbish. No way is an apparently ‘OP’ TD going to max at 100km/h. I encourage any viewers on this topic to ignore this and vote ‘No’ or ‘O hell no’. 

 

Your (absolutely not) friendly Neighbour Razer



JeanneThiccWaifu #7 Posted 09 January 2018 - 05:54 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 27183 battles
  • 1,720
  • [FEAST]
  • Member since:
    04-16-2014
Why not tank with Beam Cannon instead of shitty 4 barrel gun?

Just.,Just  Play Fallout., this gaem succ balls


LoneReaper #8 Posted 09 January 2018 - 08:34 AM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Member
  • 27690 battles
  • 363
  • [MECH]
  • Member since:
    04-03-2015
Now this girl has a point a "Beam Cannon" COOL! :B  0 sec reload and 0 aim time with auto locking heat seeking tech it would completely re-balance tier 10....... Better yet only I am allowed one COOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL!!!  :B

XF1_Razer #9 Posted 09 January 2018 - 10:40 PM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 13305 battles
  • 216
  • [DARTH]
  • Member since:
    03-17-2017

Why have so many people put ‘finally some thing to stand up against the Death Star?’

is it actually that hard for you guys to take out an FV215b 183. In my personal opinion that TD is absolute trash. It’s a messed up combination of horrible dispersion, non existent armour, big target and bad manoeuvrability. The only good thing is the DPS which in some instances is a waste. FV has APs that will bounce an E100. Seriously this TD was way better in PC. In Blitz, only the relatively unreliable DPS will get you anywhere.

 

your (not so) friendly neighbour Razer 



Diamond114 #10 Posted 12 January 2018 - 10:32 AM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 16298 battles
  • 2,234
  • [408]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014

To be honest I'm still hoping for the M50 Ontos to come out. Something like the M56 Scorpion but with 6 recoilless rifles with VERY long full reload (25-28 seconds range) and the ability to empty all 6 shots in the same per shot reload as Chi-ri and crazy bloom the more rapid your shots are. Just for fun and giggles while remaining balanced

 

If the WG clowns come up with this, I'll buy it and it'll be the first tank that I don't care about WR in (caring is stressing, all I can say)


"Fight to fly, fly to fight, FIGHT TO WIN!" - U.S Navy Fighter Weapons School TOPGUN.

 

"Nothing is right in tactics. A good fighter pilot must be free to propose improvements to his tactics or he will get himself killed." - Cmdr. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, USN.

 

"To be a good fighter pilot, there's only one prime requisite; Think Fast, and Act Faster" - John Trevor Godfrey, 336 Sqn RAF


xXYoloNoobSwagXx #11 Posted 12 January 2018 - 02:52 PM

    Captain

  • Member
  • 24287 battles
  • 2,978
  • [K1NG]
  • Member since:
    12-12-2013
Why not add in 203mm naval gun with high pen of 120mm? Does 850-1390 damager per HE shot when it pens. AP pen of 250mm and damage of 720-900.

Only accepts plats. Those that need help in grinding or wants to do stupid stuff, invite me. other than that, dont.

 

Lores: IS-3D, Rudy, Angry Connor, E25, Fearless, Dragon, JgTg Snowstorm, Dedicated Warrior, Stalwart, Victory, Edel/Lupus/Nameless, Crombie, Independence, Shinobi, Matilda BP, Drac/Helsing, Tankenstein

 

 


STEEL_Firestorm #12 Posted 06 February 2018 - 02:52 AM

    Sergeant

  • Member
  • 23689 battles
  • 106
  • Member since:
    02-09-2015

Why not WG make all maps have a massive flood and make battleships fight with drowned tanks. The battleship can have 60 000 hp and nine 183 guns as well as 10 obj 140 guns as secondary weapons.

 

Edited: also allow it to drop 6 auto piloted DD Sherman tanks.


Edited by STEEL_Firestorm, 06 February 2018 - 02:54 AM.


devilogic #13 Posted 15 November 2018 - 06:38 AM

    Private

  • Member
  • 5283 battles
  • 6
  • [W0LF]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2018
Now why don't we add this tank in, it's not like the [edited] E 100 messed up World of Tanks at all...

GoBack2Tier1 #14 Posted 01 January 2019 - 06:45 PM

    Staff Sergeant

  • Member
  • 7753 battles
  • 279
  • [WRTB]
  • Member since:
    10-18-2016

of course there should be!

hic


Yes I am one of the most toxic players I know of out there

https://www.blitzsta...sia/LightninWar





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users